Meantime, the ones who might be questioned closely on “judicial temperament” are those who trip and fail to separate their political and judicial philosophies, you might say judicially “shooting before they think.” Sotomayor is exhibit one.
One of the canards lofted to defeat judicial conservatives facing Senate confirmation is “judicial temperament.” Putting aside the irony, that catch-all allows congressional antagonists to bait a nominee, without specifics. How ironic then, that Justice Sotomayor just proved the point.
Last week, in arguments before the High Court on Biden’s highly questionable mandate on private businesses, in effect forcing employees to undergo involuntary vaccination or frequent testing by threatening OSHA punishment of their employer, the esteemed Justice proved the adage.
The adage that comes to mind is that silence allows people to presume the best of you, while speaking might cause them to question your logic – or “judicial temperament.” As Mark Twain once quipped, “It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid,” or even smart, “…than to open it and remove all doubt.”
So, what did Justice Sotomayor just do? This justice, while a role model in some ways, has repeatedly shown that her political philosophy – not her judicial one or temperament – governs her thinking, and she often missteps, suggesting questions about other justices should be kept in perspective.
This is a justice who spurred racism questions with her pre-nomination praise for the “wise” Hispanic woman over the “white male,” who has subsequently been one of the most vocal, visceral, unreserved, and some might say intemperate voices to sit on the High Court. Her dissents are often stingingly political.
Donald Trump’s extension of the Obama era policy, with congressional direction, of vetting travelers to the US from high-risk countries, dubbed a travel ban on Muslim countries, spawned a harsh dissent. Said the left-leaning justice, she bluntly – and without basis – tagged him as pushing “anti-Muslim animus.”
That was in 2018, only to be followed by a string of “out there” dissents, including one that compared state laws enforcing capital punishment to being “burned at the stake,” another that dissed the High Court when a state university ban on racial preferences was upheld, lecturing the Chief Justice on racial discrimination. See, e.g., ‘The People’s Justice’: After decade on Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor is most outspoken on bench and off.
Then she wrote a variety of anti-police opinions against GPS tracking, saying police “shoot first and think later,” and added other colorful language. When evaluating states’ rights to assure transparent or accountable elections, she seethed states just aim to purge registration of “minority, low income, disabled, and veteran voters.” The statement was objectively absurd, and she offered no proof or logic.
Then, while absolving or remaining silent on liberal states redistricting plans, she castigated a conservative state for executing a similar redistricting plan, based on a process not unlike others.
In a recent term, she conjured up what can only be described as a fanciful Court conspiracy, saying that the conservative majority was involved in pushing a “shadow docket” that did not adhere to a left-leaning agenda. What did she mean? Apparently, she did not like how oral arguments were scheduled.
Finally, she has run her mouth at times and in places that lead one to wonder, even if a supporter of her political views, whether she is exercising that vaunted “judicial temperament” to which conservatives are supposed to leave.
The latest, however, is embarrassing, the sort of bold misstatement – and from the bench – that leads an observer, of any political stripe, to put his or her head in hands. Last week, in what seems to have been off-script, off-prep, off-road judicial freelancing, she leveled politically tinged accusations.
Favoring more federal control, innately anti-state’s rights, she created a squall of affected hysteria and just let fly. Her words echoed in the courtroom apparently, like an admission against interest.
What she said was that “hospitals … are almost at full capacity with people severely ill on ventilators,” and “we have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition, many on ventilators.”
Facts are somewhat different, actually entirely different, even referencing the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), taking the best possible interpretation of what was said by the esteemed justice.
While Omicron is highly transmissible, the severity of the virus appears a fraction of past iterations. As major media have reported, “younger people are at far less risk … of severe outcomes,” and the facts uttered are drawn from the ether – nothing supports the bold-faced statement.
Did that stop this liberal, activist justice from carrying on? Did a correction swiftly issue? Was a response to the obvious misstatement – and prejudicial one – of a central, even dispositive fact get made? Is there any sense of embarrassment that a justice is making decisions on faulty, made-up information? Answer: No.
All this returns us to the opening issue. When people talk blithely of “judicial temperament,” one is well advised to think about who sits on the bench, how they behave, what wing of the court tends to showcase the opposite.
More could be said, but perhaps the best reflection on this topic is that those of conservative temperament tend to speak with deliberation, in effect, from a personal nature that is more temperate – not always, but often.
Meantime, the ones who might be questioned closely on “judicial temperament” are those who trip and fail to separate their political and judicial philosophies, you might say judicially “shooting before they think.” Sotomayor is exhibit one.
During her confirmation hearings , Sotomayer was asked how she felt about the 2nd Amendment . She replied that she was not aware of whether or not the 2nd Amendment was “incorporated” to the States . Apparently she doesn’t believe that the States ratified the whole constitution and all of its Amendments . I guess she believes that a State is not bound by the constitution . That it is a ‘federal’ only charter . That the Constitution serves only to limit the powers of the Fed in order to preserve the sovereignty of the States and/or the people . The Constitution was designed in such a way as to keep the Fed under control (or limitation by ) the States . The 2nd Amendment was intended to keep the States free ( of the fed and others , England for one ) and relied on the Sovereign citizen arms to keep it that way . Therefore , a Federal Official must NEVER be allowed to rule on or to infringe upon our 2nd Amendment . I don’t believe Sotomeyer fully understands her role as a Federal official . BTW , this is yet another reason why we must repeal the 17th Amendment and restore the States’ Legislatures to elect Senators to represent the States vis o vis the Fed. A repealed 17th Amendment will stop unfunded fed mandates dead in their tracks for one .
Not intemperance- more like incompetence! I listened to her read talking points obviously given to her by the abortion industry during the hearings about the Texas law, then she’d ask a witness a question but cut them off before they could answer the question. She’s a liberal political appointee joke!
Listen to what she stated about the situation of the Corona Virus and never realized how out of touch she is to what is actually happening in our Country and World – all she had to do is actually investigate Hospitals patients- also how can it be so bad if Hospital Administrators are firing employees who don’t take the shots but were taking care of patients from day one of virus
We must have term limits for the Supreme Court justices, 12 years and you’re done. GO HOME!
Sotomayer supremely out of touch. OUT OF TOUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Although I was probably not aware of the issues when she was appointed, it seems to be fair that the Supreme Court has completely dissolved into the political arena because of justices illogical decisions over the last decade, maybe also over the last half century. THERE WAS NO WAY THAT THE OBAMA CARE WAS LEGAL, BUT WAS ONLY PASSED ON THE MERRITS THAT IT MUST MEET THE TAX BASIS OF CONGRESS PASSING A NEW TAX ON THE CITIZENS, AND BOTH THE ARGUEMENTS FOR AND AGAINST IT DEFIED CHIEF ROBERTS SOLUTION. Anyone with common sense saw that legislation passed by manipulation of words sent forth by the chief justice. It did not rise to the legality of law as was written, and should have been defeated, but C.J Robert’s returned it to be corrected by the DNC for making it eligible as a tax code. Once the tax section was stripped out of the law, it became no longer eligible as the law of the land, and it should have been removed. Only one Senator whom had run on the promise to remove Obama signature law betrayed his state and people that elected him. McCain was known as Rhino, but never before had so much been put on a mans simple vote, he was a dead man walking, and he tarnished any sense of his historical past. THE SUPREPME COURTS JOB IS NOT TO WRITE LAW, BUT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE LAWS PASSED BY CONGRESS MEETS THE STANDARDS TO PASS THE CONSTITUTION. Many lower courts have been involved in writing law, not judging on the current laws on the books. We can blame the people we elect, they are too incompetent or just plain political motivated to write laws that surely the courts must try to address, and that is where the courts are now political arena of the two party system.
Another ignorant commie Dem. Another Obama mistake.
She was put on the court by Obama and unfortunately made it through. Her years on the court one need not look up the decisions she’s voted on they are all far left decisions along with Kagan another disaster. I would be happy if some of the the conservative side like the recent decent from Kavanaugh and Roberts sided with the leftist judges in allowing vaccines to keep being administered to the medical profession. I would like to see some leftist judges going against a standard vote in favor of the left and have them side with the conservative side. It would then seem that we have judges who use their own sense not just a liberal or conservative bent.
Very good article and perhaps we should consider a method of judicial review whereby a justice could be removed for such incompetence!
Is impeachment for cause an option for a justice of the Supreme Court? I nominate this woman to get the award for “first incompetent Justice to be removed from the Supreme Court.” [NOTE: the Democrats consistently like to make a big deal out of the “FIRST” people to do anything.]
This justice should not even be in this country. She hates America and her people. People like her do not belong in this country. They would do this country a great service by going where their garbage beliefs are accepted. We area nation founded under God with Judeo-Christian values and beliefs and she does not recognize that let alone rule on our Constitution instead of her personal ideology.
Kind of makes you think term limits on SCOTUS would be a good thing.
When she was confirmed to sit on the Court she stated she would rule on how she “FELT: about the argument being presented and not on the Constitution. She has done that consistently, no matter how ignorant her feelings were. A sad choice for a Supreme Court Judge..
That someone so out of touch with reality could be on the “supreme court” is frightening.
One more point. We have a democratic Republic. A republic represents all the people. Democracy is when only the majority rules. The Electoral College was designed to prevent that from happening. If we had a democracy then New York and LA could decide each election. Plato called democracy “mob rule,” and the worst kind of government. It seems that the left-wing mob is ruling. How sad that dullards, thugs, liars, and cheats are in charge at the very time we need people who are real, honest, good, and seek the truth. Term limits for all of our public SERVANTS!!!!! They are our employees! And what about the left wing bureaucracy implanted like rotten teeth throughout the various government offices?
Sotomayor is not very bright with no sense of shame just as so many on the radical side of things are not bright. Left-wingers seem uneducated to the horrors of socialism/communism/progressiveness. The horrors lead to total control by dictating mad men. It seems also that true mental illness is at the root of many who burn, steal, and murder in the name of a philosophy which ends in burning, stealing, and murdering other humans, but when in office just stealing and lying. The article is very understated and even kind in a polite society kind of way. Yet, there is regret the essay does not point out the evil inherent in her words which are so like the left to lie, lie, lie, and then some. People who want to save the country and the Constitution keep wondering if the left always lies or are they just stupid.
“most outspoken” may, or may not, be issues with Sotomayor, but her stupidity and idiocy certainly are. Her appointment snacks of political favoritism, as she’s really too stupid to have passed a bar….anywhere.
Her ignorance is actually frightening.
So she lied during her conformation hearings, what’s new. Their appointment should be revoked if they cannot leave their political views behind and follow our CONSTITUTION. Years ago a powerful attorney had their car in for service and on the front seat were books on how the LIBERAL COMMIES will use the Judicial system to destroy the Constitution. Justice Sotomayor is a PRIME EXAMPLE!
Judicial Philosophy in this instance, is devoid of good old common sense, horse sense, or just a sense of how this country is doing as a whole. When these all knowing judges sit down to deliberate discuss, and meditate on all things precedent; they need to take a walk around the block. They need to pick up the newspaper and see how the ordinary people are attempting to survive in this country. They need to get their judicial feet squarely on the ground. Every decision they make affects the whole country & the economy too! Sometimes, they effectively divide the country; when they don’t take the WHOLE COUNTRY into consideration!
This is the kind of judge the left wants in place as they seek to pack the court and push our republic into a one party state……balance is needed, and the rest of the judges should see just what imbalance comes when the likes of this judge opens her mouth and espouses anything but “constitutional” concern. Sadly, we are stuck with her for many years to come and we seem to have little “counter-balance” in place. I don’t understand why those presenting this care did not challenge her wrong information in the process of these oral arguments…..she propagated lies as argument against the issue and needed to be called out on the spot.
This broad needs to go back to the rule of law that insists that judges are there to enforce the laws of our country, uphold the constitution, and do so without political forethought or interference. She is the epitome of a far left radical politician that has absolutely no business being on the supreme court.
Sotomayor is about as good an example of how to rig SCOTUS to fit a Communist governance. Which brings to mind a need for a term limit on SCOTUS members. Maybe something on the order of 25 years. I do not believe ANY political appointee should be allowed lifetime tenure. And don’t be fooled that SCOTUS appointees are NOT political appointees. In times past there have been very qualified and knowledgeable nominees that have been rejected by a political majority because in truth they nominee did not fit well in to their political philosophy and/or goals.
The “esteemed” Justice showed all what a blithering idiot she is, with her made up Omicron stats. However, the bigger problem is that even IF those numbers were true, they are completely irrelevant to what she is supposed to be doing – rendering judgement on the legality or constitutionality of the case before her. It truly boggles the mind that such an incompetent fool is sitting on the highest court in our land
Kamala’s twin sister???
Liberal intemperance??? More like liberal ignorance. A lot of incompetence in higher levels of our government right now. Dangerous.
I have to say, I have lost all confidence in the Supreme Court. This lady, with her absolutely stupid, uninformed remarks about 100,000 kids being in hospitals told me she must watch CNN non-stop to get her worldview. Two other ‘justices’ showed their total ignorance regarding what’s going on in our country as well. Frankly, I think the “man on the street” has more common sense.
STUPID IS . . . STUPID DOES!!!
At her confirmation hearings there were questions about her less than stellar grades in law school and the fact that her rulings on the appellate court were frequently overturned.
We deserve better. She’s a political appointee meant to appease a section of society. Instead, she shames us all.
First, I have known some very smart women. I love intelligent women. I love strong women. So this is nothing against women. But, I have noticed that some people, not just women, are promoted that do not have the capability to do those jobs. Then they are put in the job and everyone else is expected to help them do their jobs because they cannot get them done. This is the problem. This judge should be very smart. But it looks like she was chosen for the job because she was a liberal woman. Not because she was not that smart. This makes me question the intelligence of lawyers and judges, now. It has been said that you should always engage the brain before opening your mouth. I hope that is what happened here, she forgot to think. But I doubt it. She should have never been nominated, yet given the Supreme Court job. I guess this is really showing how the Elites get who they want appointed to the Supreme court. They are most likely the ones who come up with the list of nominees for the Supreme Court.
Justice Sotomayor is just another uninformed fool with too much power over the hard working tax payers. She will probably be on the bench for another 40 years. We the American people have to put up with these privileged people. At least she should stay informed. What a lazy women.
Can we fire her??????????????
Even not knowing someone personally it’s pretty easy to know what side of the isle they prefer to walk on…Jesus said, ‘By their fruits you will know them.’ So I guess from that we can take away that from a persons views and actions, we CAN ‘know’ them. So from what I’ve learned from Sotamoyor is enough to call her an immature and ignorant woman. Only a ‘stupid educated’ person like Obama could get someone like her on the Supreme Court. But are there any ethics rules that Justice’s have to comply with to remain on the bench? I find it difficult to believe that someone who is prejudicial and bias when making legal arguments isn’t impeached from the bench, especially the highest Court in the land! Seems every aspect of our governance is ‘Wimpy!’ How could we let it come to this? You know, when Obama was first running for POTUS, I was very impressed with his demeanor and poise. I bet a lot of people were. That was his ‘ticket in.’ But just before he was elected, he gave a speech and included in that speech was his admission to being PRO-CHOICE. That did it for me! I did not vote for him because of his support for abortion. I realized that just because one claims to be ‘highly educated’ does not mean they are gifted with intelligence. That is how I came up with the term, ‘stupid educated.’
We found out unfortunately how many compromisers decided to vote for him anyway…to our demise. And now we have three Liberal Justices being allowed to remain in their positions on the SCOTUS.
I think our education system died long ago for this country to be where it is now. Just how long has it been since our Bill Of Rights and our Constitution, as well as our true history about this country has been taught in our schools…30, 40, or 50 years now?? Yup, this country gas been on track for dumbing down for an unbelievable amount of time. How did this happen? Man is flawed and refused to acknowledge a while ago where that knowledge comes from. Allowing for our sinful nature to engage more and more over time, giving way to the acceptance of behavior which in God’s eye’s would determine our fate of living with undesirable consequences. For instance, accepting a deviant like Barack Hussein Obama, elected to be a leader of the most powerful nation on earth. The price of that we are learning is almost impossible to bear. I believe everything that’s happening is locked in step with this country choosing to walk away from the One who really made us great! GOD made us great, but is it His plan to make us ‘great again?’ Only He knows that, but that’s why I will continue to pray that He will.
And may God help us all!
If this was the “wisest Latina” Obama was able to find, then he didn’t think much of Latinos.
I just spent about 5 minutes trying to post my previous comment. First 3 times was to complete the puzzle, the 4th time my credentials weren’t good enough. The last time I had to retype my name and email address. I think you’ve been hacked AMAC!! I didn’t want my last name to be posted either. I’m removing it to see if that worked we’ll see.
AMAC, is there a justifiable reason your members need to get their comments approved over people who are commenting some kind of ad for financial gain, which is probably SPAM?? I would really like to know, thanks.
I have a son-in-law who often makes stupid or false statements. He gets all his info from MSNBC. Give Sotomayor a break; she probably gets her info from MSNBC. Of coarse, she’s ignorant!
Sotomayor as well as Kagan were Obama appointees, presumably they share Obama’s desire to tear down and remake America in their chosen political image (which is not a Constitutional Republic).
Is she ignorant, a liar, or both?
…. And yet, she wields her politically biased rulings like a dull sword from the security of her elevated position of wealth, power AND privilege …. for the rest of her life. THAT is the most unfortunate thing of all.
totalitarians have ALWAYS been intemperate! They are mentally deranged, by nature. Nothing is EVER going to change that.
OMG!
Does she not understand the difference between personal preference and he long?
She defines buffoon.
this women is too stupid to be a Justice
We all make mistakes but this seems to be a trend among progressives where you blurt out something to support your agenda without really considering it’s merits. What’s really scary is that accountability for wrong words or bad results seems to be a thing of the past.
A Justice who does not know the facts cannot be just about their decisions of any issue. No more do I want U.S. laws to be affected by Biblical quotes to decide on the legality of when we consider ending a beating heart in an unborn child, do I want U.S. laws to be affected by politicized data that has no basis in truth to decide how much we should react or overreact to health issues. The very first thing a Supreme Court Justice is to determine is if the subject at hand in any way defies the U.S. Constitution and American citizens rights as they are defined in the Bill of Rights.
before she was on the supreme court there was a test i think it was for firemen she wanted a new test because no minorities passed the test she took it to the supreme court she lost
Una Latina estupida.
Hope those who voted for Biden are happy with their vote!
I pray America survives this administration!
She is a disgrace and was never a good choice for supreme court judge
When she was recently seen in DC openly dining and socializing with members of the demon, jackal squad, it showed me who was filling her mind with all the misinformation to spew out. She’s just a puppet like Brandon.
How true, but in this administration, being competent is not a requisite for appointments to such high places. The only ticket to success is that one be a liberal or a Far Leftist. Conservatives need not even apply.
Funny I have not heard a complete sentence come out of her pie hole . But I treat the left like the left treats the right . Case in point your other article on why no one is held accountable for Afghanistan and no one will and like the Americans in Libya. America get any justice on that one only dead Americans . Thanks Amac on reporting what goes out of her pie hole I am not listening !
Her openly expressed biases and interjection of false information into a court proceeding renders her unfit to serve as a Justice on any court, and especially the US Supreme Court. Collectively, her reprehensible conduct provides sufficient cause for removing her from the bench, and precluding her from serving as a justice or magistrate in any court.